Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The size frequency distribution of exoplanet radii between 1 and 4 R ⊕ is bimodal with peaks at ∼1.4 R ⊕ and ∼2.4 R ⊕ , and a valley at ∼1.8 R ⊕ . This radius valley separates two classes of planets—usually referred to as “super-Earths” and “mini-Neptunes”—and its origin remains debated. One model proposes that super-Earths are the outcome of photoevaporation or core-powered mass loss stripping the primordial atmospheres of the mini-Neptunes. A contrasting model interprets the radius valley as a dichotomy in the bulk compositions, where super-Earths are rocky planets and mini-Neptunes are water-ice-rich worlds. In this work, we test whether the migration model is consistent with the radius valley and how it distinguishes these views. In the migration model, planets migrate toward the disk’s inner edge, forming a chain of planets locked in resonant configurations. After the gas disk dispersal, orbital instabilities “break the chains” and promote late collisions. This model broadly matches the period-ratio and planet-multiplicity distributions of Kepler planets and accounts for resonant chains such as TRAPPIST-1, Kepler-223, and TOI-178. Here, by combining the outcome of planet formation simulations with compositional mass–radius relationships and assuming the complete loss of primordial H-rich atmospheres in late giant impacts, we show that the migration model accounts for the exoplanet radius valley and the intrasystem uniformity (“peas in a pod”) of Kepler planets. Our results suggest that planets with sizes of ∼1.4 R ⊕ are mostly rocky, whereas those with sizes of ∼2.4 R ⊕ are mostly water-ice-rich worlds. Our results do not support an exclusively rocky composition for the cores of mini-Neptunes.
Izidoro et al. (Tue,) studied this question.