Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Concentrated tin- and fluoride-containing mouthrinses are effective erosion inhibitors in enamel and dentin. To test whether this is also true for solutions with lower concentrations, we conducted a randomized double-blind three-cell crossover in situ study with extra-orally performed erosive impacts (citric acid, 6 x 5 min/day) and an intra-oral rinsing protocol (1 x 30 sec/day) in 24 volunteers. The mouthrinses were a placebo, a NaF (500 ppm F⁻), and an amine fluoride (AmF)/NaF/SnCl₂ mouthrinse (500 ppm F⁻, 800 ppm Sn(2+)). Compared with the placebo, the NaF mouthrinse reduced substance loss by 19% in enamel and 23% in dentin (p ≤ 0.01 each); the AmF/NaF/SnCl₂ mouthrinse reduced this parameter by 67% in enamel and 47% in dentin (p ≤ 0.001 each). AmF/NaF/SnCl₂ was significantly more effective than NaF in both tissues (p ≤ 0.01). The mouthrinse containing Sn and F exhibited good efficacy, even under severe erosive conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ganß et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: