Key result
This review summarizes pivotal trials and real-world data on the effectiveness, safety, and economic viability of apixaban for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
What is the impact of apixaban on patient outcomes, effectiveness, safety, and economic viability in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
What is the impact of apixaban on patient outcomes, effectiveness, safety, and economic viability in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
This review summarizes pivotal trials and real-world data regarding the effectiveness, safety, and economic viability of apixaban for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Apixaban trial overview may inform AF management; leaves open integration of patient-reported outcomes into care.
Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia worldwide, and carries a significantly increased risk of thromboembolic stroke. Initially, vitamin K antagonists were used as stroke prophylaxis; but more recently, a group of drugs known as novel oral anticoagulants have been developed. Apixaban belongs to this group of drugs, and is a factor Xa inhibitor that has emerged as a popular pharmacological agent worldwide. In this review, we will provide an overview of the pivotal trials in the development of apixaban, while also critically evaluating the new emerging real-world data, and discussing the effectiveness, safety, economic viability and future prospects of apixaban and how it impacts on patient outcomes in those with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ioannou et al. (2017) conducted a review in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Apixaban was evaluated. This review summarizes pivotal trials and real-world data on the effectiveness, safety, and economic viability of apixaban for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: