Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The intermingling to which Durkheim refers is, in the end, not a fusion but a fiction, a fiction which in turn is accepted because the parties to it have an interest in accepting it. Like the political relationship of representation itself, the possibility of betrayal is a defining feature. The ballot is not a mechanical substitute for representation, it is its simulacrum. Some machines, like some representatives, conceal this possibility better than others. But the idea of a perfect vote is in the end no better than the idea of the perfect representative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheila Jasanoff (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: