Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Axis 4 of the E uropean F isheries F und is an important new opportunity for fishing communities which offers the prospect of integrating local territorial approaches and strategies to support the fishing sector. But what does it mean to find a ‘middle way’ where households, businesses and localities dependent on fishing are part of an integrated strategy for local territorial development? In this article we review these models of development and draw on case‐study findings to discuss how F isheries L ocal A ction G roups ( FLAGs ) provide lessons for the future. The article reveals a need for greater clarity regarding the intended beneficiaries and overarching novel purpose of A xis 4 and sets out an original typology of fisheries dependency to help guide local strategies. Looking beyond local impacts, the article argues that the success of the initiative may be judged in terms of how far steering a middle course can contribute to the broader transformation of fisheries policy and to what extent FLAGs can play a role in evidencing the resilience and vulnerabilities of fishing communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phillipson et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: