Key result
A survey of Australian surgeons found that 64% were supportive of the non-medical surgical assistant role in the private sector, and 35% currently use one.
Cross-Sectional (n=445)
There is broad support among Australian surgeons for the role of non-medical surgical assistants, with a majority advocating for RACS oversight.
Moderate surgeon support for non-medical surgical assistants in Australia warrants caution before role expansion; leaves open optimal governance and training standards.
Background: A non-medical surgical assistant is a clinician who provides perioperative care in the role of surgical assistant but does not possess a medical degree. This role has been practiced in Australia for more than 20 years. Aim: This survey investigates Australian surgeons’ attitudes and current practice regarding the role of the non-medical surgical assistant. Design/method: Distribution of the survey was online in December 2015 by the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS). Data analysis was descriptive using online survey methodology and convenience sampling. Results: In the private sector in Australia 105 respondents (35 per cent) use a non-medical surgical assistant. In the private sector in Australia, 188 respondents (64 per cent) were ‘very supportive’ or ‘supportive to some degree’ of the role, with 60 (20 per cent) ‘undecided’ and 48 (16 per cent) ‘not supportive’. Conclusion: The results illustrate there is support in the Australian surgical community for the role. The majority of respondents advocated contribution to governance of the role and curricula oversight by the RACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hains et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Surgeons' attitudes toward non-medical surgical assistants (n=445). Non-medical surgical assistant (NMSA) role was evaluated on Support for the NMSA role in the private sector. A survey of Australian surgeons found that 64% were supportive of the non-medical surgical assistant role in the private sector, and 35% currently use one.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: