Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) displays neurotrophic and neuroprotective activities, but the mechanisms underlying these effects have not been defined. Neuropilin-1 (NP-1) is a receptor for VEGF165 and placental growth factor-2 (PlGF-2), but the role of NP-1 in VEGF-dependent neurotrophic actions is unclear. Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons expressed high levels of NP-1 mRNA and protein, much lower levels of KDR, and no detectable Flt-1. VEGF165 and PlGF-2 promoted DRG growth cone formation with an effect similar to that of nerve growth factor, whereas the Flt-1-specific ligand, PlGF-1, and the KDR/Flt-4 ligand, VEGF-D, had no effect. The chemorepellent NP-1 ligand, semaphorin 3A, antagonized the response to VEGF and PlGF-2. The specific KDR inhibitor, SU5614, did not affect the anti-chemorepellent effects of VEGF and PlGF-2, whereas a novel, specific antagonist of VEGF binding to NP-1, called EG3287, prevented inhibition of growth cone collapse. VEGF stimulated prostacyclin and prostaglandin E2 production in DRG cultures that was blocked by inhibitors of cyclooxygenases; the anti-chemorepellent activities of VEGF and PlGF-2 were abrogated by cyclooxygenase inhibitors, and a variety of prostacyclin analogues and prostaglandins strikingly inhibited growth cone collapse. These findings support a specific role for NP-1 in mediating neurotrophic actions of VEGF family members and also identify a novel role for prostanoids in the inhibition of neuronal chemorepulsion. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) displays neurotrophic and neuroprotective activities, but the mechanisms underlying these effects have not been defined. Neuropilin-1 (NP-1) is a receptor for VEGF165 and placental growth factor-2 (PlGF-2), but the role of NP-1 in VEGF-dependent neurotrophic actions is unclear. Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons expressed high levels of NP-1 mRNA and protein, much lower levels of KDR, and no detectable Flt-1. VEGF165 and PlGF-2 promoted DRG growth cone formation with an effect similar to that of nerve growth factor, whereas the Flt-1-specific ligand, PlGF-1, and the KDR/Flt-4 ligand, VEGF-D, had no effect. The chemorepellent NP-1 ligand, semaphorin 3A, antagonized the response to VEGF and PlGF-2. The specific KDR inhibitor, SU5614, did not affect the anti-chemorepellent effects of VEGF and PlGF-2, whereas a novel, specific antagonist of VEGF binding to NP-1, called EG3287, prevented inhibition of growth cone collapse. VEGF stimulated prostacyclin and prostaglandin E2 production in DRG cultures that was blocked by inhibitors of cyclooxygenases; the anti-chemorepellent activities of VEGF and PlGF-2 were abrogated by cyclooxygenase inhibitors, and a variety of prostacyclin analogues and prostaglandins strikingly inhibited growth cone collapse. These findings support a specific role for NP-1 in mediating neurotrophic actions of VEGF family members and also identify a novel role for prostanoids in the inhibition of neuronal chemorepulsion. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) 1The abbreviations used are: VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; DRG, dorsal root ganglion; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; NP-1, neuropilin-1; PAE/KDR, porcine aortic endothelial cells expressing KDR; PAE/NP-1, porcine aortic endothelial cells expressing NP-1; PGI2, prostacyclin; sema 3A, semaphorin 3A; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; RT, reverse transcriptase; DDA, dideoxyadenosine; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; COX, cyclooxygenase; hVEGF, human VEGF; rat VEGF; PlGF, placental growth factor; PGE2, prostaglandin E2. is an essential mediator of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis during embryonic development and plays a central role in pathophysiological neovascularization in human disease (1Ferrara N. Gerber H.-P. LeCouter J. Nat. Med. 2003; 9: 669-676Crossref PubMed Scopus (8076) Google Scholar, 2Carmeliet P. Jain R. Nat. Med. 2003; 9: 653-660Crossref PubMed Scopus (3563) Google Scholar). A growing body of evidence indicates that VEGF also has neurotrophic and neuroprotective activities. VEGF stimulates axonal outgrowth and enhances the survival of superior cervical and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons (3Sondell M. Lundborg G. Kanje M. J. Neurosci. 1999; 19: 5731-5740Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 4Sondell M. Sundler F. Kanje M. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2000; 12: 4243-4254Crossref PubMed Scopus (340) Google Scholar), inhibits hypoxic death of cortical neurons in culture (5Jin K.L. Mao X.O. Greenberg D.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 10242-10247Crossref PubMed Scopus (640) Google Scholar) and in cerebral ischemia (6Sun Y. Jin K. Xie L. Childs J. Mao X.O. Logvinova A. Greenberg D.A. J. Clin. Investig. 2003; 111: 1843-1851Crossref PubMed Scopus (1051) Google Scholar), and promotes neurogenesis in vitro and in vivo (7Jin K. Zhu Y. Sun Y. Mao X.O. Xie L. Greenberg D.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002; 99: 11946-11950Crossref PubMed Scopus (1309) Google Scholar). The mechanisms underlying the neuronal effects of VEGF remain largely unclear, however. VEGF exerts its biological effects through high affinity binding to two tyrosine kinase receptors, Flt-1 (VEGF-R1) and KDR (VEGF-R2), which are expressed in most vascular endothelial cells (8Neufeld G. Cohen T. Gengrinovitch S. Poltorak Z. FASEB J. 1999; 13: 9-22Crossref PubMed Scopus (3182) Google Scholar, 9Zachary I. Gliki G. Cardiovasc. Res. 2001; 49: 568-581Crossref PubMed Scopus (586) Google Scholar). KDR binds VEGF with lower affinity than Flt-1 and is also recognized by VEGF-C, VEGF-D, and VEGF-E, whereas Flt-1 is also a receptor for PlGF and VEGF-B (1Ferrara N. Gerber H.-P. LeCouter J. Nat. Med. 2003; 9: 669-676Crossref PubMed Scopus (8076) Google Scholar). After binding and activation of KDR, VEGF stimulates extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation and an array of other early signaling events followed by short and long term cellular biological effects including production of prostacyclin (PGI2) and nitric oxide, increased cell survival, cell migration, proliferation, and angiogenesis (10Waltenberger J. Claesson Welsh L. Siegbahn A. Shibuya M. Heldin C.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1994; 269: 26988-26995Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 11Laitinen M. Zachary I. Breier G. Pakkanen T. Hakkinen T. Luoma J. Abedi H. Risau W. Soma M. Laakso M. Martin J.F. Yla Herttuala S. Hum. Gene Ther. 1997; 8: 1737-1744Crossref PubMed Scopus (181) Google Scholar, 12Wheeler-Jones C. Abu-Ghazaleh R. Cospedal R. Houliston R.A. Martin J. Zachary I. FEBS Lett. 1997; 420: 28-32Crossref PubMed Scopus (238) Google Scholar, 13Xia P. Aiello L.P. Ishii H. Jiang Z.Y. Park D.J. Robinson G.S. Takagi H. Newsome W.P. Jirousek M.R. King G.L. J. Clin. Investig. 1996; 98: 2018-2026Crossref PubMed Scopus (529) Google Scholar, 14Gerber H.P. McMurtrey A. Kowalski J. Yan M. Keyt B.A. Dixit V. Ferrara N. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 30336-30343Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1761) Google Scholar, 15Takahashi T. Yamaguchi S. Chida K. Shibuya M. EMBO J. 2001; 20: 2768-2778Crossref PubMed Scopus (626) Google Scholar, 16Gliki G. Abu-Ghazaleh R. Jezequel S. Wheeler-Jones C. Zachary I. Biochem. J. 2001; 353: 503-512Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar, 17Abedi H. Zachary I. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 15442-15451Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (424) Google Scholar). The function of Flt-1 in the endothelium is unclear, but it is thought to regulate the activity of VEGF partly by acting as a decoy receptor, and in part though direct regulatory effects on KDR (1Ferrara N. Gerber H.-P. LeCouter J. Nat. Med. 2003; 9: 669-676Crossref PubMed Scopus (8076) Google Scholar, 18Zeng H. Dvorak H.F. Mukhopadhyay D. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 26969-26979Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (263) Google Scholar). Neuropilin-1 (NP-1) is a non-tyrosine kinase receptor for VEGF165, the heparin-binding PlGF-2 isoform, VEGF-B, and VEGF-E (19Soker S. Takashima S. Miao H.Q. Neufeld G. Klagsbrun M. Cell. 1998; 92: 735-745Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2115) Google Scholar, 20Migdal M. Huppertz B. Tessler S. Comforti A. Shibuya M. Reich R. Baumann H. Neufeld G. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 22272-22278Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (284) Google Scholar, 21Makinen T. Olofsson B. Karpanen T. Hellman U. Soker S. Klagsbrun M. Eriksson U. Alitalo K. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 21217-21222Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (234) Google Scholar). NP-1 was first identified as a receptor for semaphorin 3A (sema 3A), a member of a family of polypeptides involved in axonal guidance and patterning (22He Z. Tessier-Lavigne M. Cell. 1997; 90: 739-751Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (987) Google Scholar, 23Kolodkin A.L. Levengood D.V. Rowe E.G. Tai Y.T. Giger R.J. Ginty D.D. Cell. 1997; 90: 753-762Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1019) Google Scholar), and is expressed in endothelial cells, several tumor cell types, and in certain types of neuron including DRG, olfactory, and optic nerves (19Soker S. Takashima S. Miao H.Q. Neufeld G. Klagsbrun M. Cell. 1998; 92: 735-745Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2115) Google Scholar, 24Fujisawa H. Kitsukawa T. Kawakami A. Takagi S. Shimizu M. Hirata T. Cell Tissue Res. 1997; 290: 465-470Crossref PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar). NP-2 has a similar domain structure to NP-1 with 44% amino acid identity and exhibits a distinct expression pattern in the developing nervous system (23Kolodkin A.L. Levengood D.V. Rowe E.G. Tai Y.T. Giger R.J. Ginty D.D. Cell. 1997; 90: 753-762Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1019) Google Scholar, 25Chen H. Chedotal A. He Z. Goodman C.S. Tessier-Lavigne M. Neuron. 1997; 19: 547-559Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (576) Google Scholar). Sema 3A binds and induces neuronal growth cone collapse specifically through NP-1, whereas sema 3B, 3C, 3E, and 3F recognize both neuropilins, acting as NP-1 antagonists and NP-2 agonists (25Chen H. Chedotal A. He Z. Goodman C.S. Tessier-Lavigne M. Neuron. 1997; 19: 547-559Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (576) Google Scholar, 26Chen H. He Z. Bagri A. Tessier-Lavigne M. Neuron. 1998; 21: 1283-1290Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (250) Google Scholar, 27Giger R.J. Urquhart E.R. Gillespie S.K. Levengood D.V. Ginty D.D. Kolodkin A.L. Neuron. 1998; 21: 1079-1092Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (313) Google Scholar, 28Takahashi T. Nakamura F. Jin Z. Kalb R.G. Strittmatter S.M. Nat. Neurosci. 1998; 1: 487-493Crossref PubMed Scopus (186) Google Scholar). Neuropilins also play essential roles in angiogenesis. Overexpression of NP-1 in mice results in increased capillary formation, vasodilatation, and malformation of the heart (29Kitsukawa T. Shimono A. Kawakami A. Kondoh H. Fujisawa H. Development. 1995; 121: 4309-4318Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), whereas mice deficient in NP-1 exhibit both defects in embryonic axonal patterning and an array of vascular abnormalities including defective development of large vessels and impaired neural and yolk sac vascularization (30Kawasaki T. Kitsukawa T. Bekku Y. Matsuda Y. Sanbo M. Yagi T. Fujisawa H. Development. 1999; 126: 4895-4902Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Inactivation of both NP-1 and NP-2 causes a more severe failure of embryonic vascularization resulting in death at E8.5 (31Takashima S. Kitakaze M. Asakura M. Asanuma H. Sanada S. Tashiro F. Niwa H. Miyazaki J.J. Hirota S. Kitamura Y. Kitsukawa T. Fujisawa H. Klagsbrun M. Hori M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002; 99: 3657-3662Crossref PubMed Scopus (327) Google Scholar). However, despite the strong evidence that NP-1 is a major receptor for VEGF165, its roles in the biological functions of this factor remain poorly understood. In this study, we sought to define the receptors and intracellular mechanisms underlying VEGF-dependent inhibition of DRG growth cone collapse. DRG neurons expressed high levels of NP-1 mRNA and and a of and PlGF-2, for NP-1, both inhibited growth cone collapse with similar whereas specific for Flt-1 KDR and had no effect. The effects of and PlGF-2 were by KDR inhibition but were blocked by a specific of VEGF binding to The results also that the inhibition of growth cone collapse by VEGF family NP-1 is production and that prostanoids anti-chemorepellent effects on DRG These findings roles for NP-1 and in mediating neuroprotective effects of VEGF family members in DRG human VEGF165 rat PlGF-1, PlGF-2, sema 3A, and were and were the of PGE2, and were and were and were cell and DMEM, were and was as and M. U. S. Scholar) and by and was Full of the and biological of A. M. L. D. and I. in other used were of the Cell umbilical vein endothelial cells were and in endothelial cell with human growth factor, and aortic endothelial cells expressing NP-1 were by The cells were in and B. cells expressing KDR Flt-1 were by and in and Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) were as L. 2002; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, L. Neuron. 1996; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) on culture with and in with and with nerve growth factor was in culture to DRG neuronal cell DRG were and at in and were by of and the was The cell was in growth and through to a cell nerves were to cells, and through and the cells were by to cells and as L. Neuron. 1996; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). These cells were on and and in were and on growth was cultures of neurons were and in in with and growth and to were and were for a at the sema 3A was for to cells were with the for and with and in with and were with In cells were with to followed by and to were at the of the axonal that the cell growth had no the were by for and were to were in and were by and to were with to NP-1, KDR, and Flt-1 and was the an was the to was of the first system for were on a the and rat human The for to the was for were with to expression of and first were used to expression of and KDR and and Flt-1 and were on and by endothelial cells in were with of as in binding were followed by of the of After of at the was and with The cells were with and the of the was binding was in the of and E2 and the were in DRG culture specific of was the in the of growth cone collapse two were by A of was as The expression of the VEGF receptors, KDR, NP-1, and was in DRG neurons by and and with that in an endothelial cell that receptors DRG cells, and neurons expressed mRNA for NP-1 at a similar to that in and NP-2 at a lower KDR mRNA was detectable in DRG neurons but at a much lower than in and Flt-1 expression was not detectable KDR and Flt-1 were not in the other neuronal cell types that neurons expressed a of that with the major NP-1 in and at a similar In NP-2 was expressed in but not detectable in DRG to KDR and Flt-1 not in DRG neurons but were expressed in of DRG with in the of other growth cone collapse to an effect similar to that of nerve growth factor In to the of growth it was also that a in the of growth effects were by and the heparin-binding PlGF isoform, PlGF-2, that binds to both Flt-1 and NP-1 M. Huppertz B. Tessler S. Comforti A. Shibuya M. Reich R. Baumann H. Neufeld G. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 22272-22278Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (284) Google Scholar). In PlGF-1, a specific for Flt-1 that is to NP-1, no in growth cone collapse. In VEGF-D, a for KDR and M. T. A. Alitalo K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), had no effect on growth cone collapse at to it was that at KDR extracellular signal-regulated kinase cell migration, and in not sema 3A growth cone collapse in DRG in a and with PlGF-2 inhibited the effect of and sema 3A The effects of were not by a specific of the KDR tyrosine SU5614, whereas this blocked a of signaling events and biological in not specifically the role of NP-1 receptors in DRG several by VEGF identified as the major S. S. H. H. Klagsbrun M. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), were for effects on binding to a of a and M. U. S. Scholar) to of VEGF165 the of and of inhibited binding to inhibited binding of to with an of and inhibition of binding at but had no effect on binding to cells also inhibited to with and inhibition of specific binding at with expression of KDR and Flt-1 receptors in these cells of as by inhibition of binding to NP-1, for to with at in a the effects of and PlGF-2 the and also blocked the of VEGF to sema growth cone collapse not of sema 3A with a of the antagonist in growth cone collapse that with sema 3A but the effect of the two was not not of DRG with a and in growth cone collapse with a detectable effect at and a effect at similar to the effect of sema 3A The results in that the and effects of VEGF in DRG growth were through the NP-1 receptor with of Flt-1 the major VEGF signaling receptor, that NP-1 not have a signaling we other signaling that for mediating VEGF-dependent inhibition of DRG growth cone collapse. direct effects on neurons specific and receptors S.M. J. 1998; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, T. F. T. Hirata M. A. Y. A. Y. T. N. A. S. S. 1997; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M.R. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, C. H. J. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) and also biological functions of VEGF C. Abu-Ghazaleh R. Cospedal R. Houliston R.A. Martin J. Zachary I. FEBS Lett. 1997; 420: 28-32Crossref PubMed Scopus (238) Google Scholar, 16Gliki G. Abu-Ghazaleh R. Jezequel S. Wheeler-Jones C. Zachary I. Biochem. J. 2001; 353: 503-512Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar). The role of prostanoids in neurotrophic growth cone activity has not been of DRG neurons with and PlGF-2 increased production of and that was inhibited by the cyclooxygenase inhibitor, and specific inhibitors of and In and PlGF-2, increased production of and and for and PlGF-2 and and and for and PlGF-2 the and production was in DRG cultures and was also by inhibitors production was for the inhibition of growth cone collapse by and PlGF-2, DRG were with these in the of an in the of growth cone collapse and prevented inhibition of collapse by PlGF-2 and the effects of and PlGF-2 and a more inhibition of the response to and PlGF-2 The inhibition of anti-chemorepellent effects of VEGF by inhibitors to of prostanoids growth cone collapse. The prostacyclin analogues and a in the of growth by an in the of growth A and In the and PGE2, inhibited growth cone whereas the and receptor and the had effect. to results with and PlGF-2, antagonized the effects of and sema 3A inhibition of growth cone collapse by was blocked by a of and the inhibitors did not the effect of that the of prostacyclin inhibition of of the of the effects of PlGF-2, and that a more inhibition of growth cone collapse had a effect and its effect was whereas inhibition of growth cone collapse by PlGF-2 was detectable and a in The biological effects of prostacyclin and its analogues are activation of domain receptors by the protein, to activation and of intracellular The role of this in mediating effects of prostacyclin on growth was two inhibitors, and in and both inhibited the in the of growth in a but had no effect on collapse. evidence that NP-1 binds VEGF and is for vascular the role of this receptor in VEGF biological functions has not been defined. The support the that the effects of VEGF in DRG neurons are by NP-1 and are to the VEGF tyrosine kinase receptors, KDR DRG neurons expressed high levels of mRNA and for NP-1 but expression of KDR and no detectable PlGF-2, an of the factor PlGF that binds NP-1 and but not KDR, inhibited growth cone whereas PlGF-1, which binds VEGF-D, a for KDR and inhibition of DRG neuronal collapse. the specific KDR did not the effect of VEGF, whereas EG3287, a specific antagonist of VEGF binding to NP-1, blocked inhibition of growth cone collapse a similar to that for inhibition of binding to VEGF inhibited sema growth cone collapse in DRG with VEGF and sema 3A for binding to NP-1 as H.Q. Soker S. L. Klagsbrun M. J. Cell Biol. 1999; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), and the effect of VEGF on sema was blocked by These findings that inhibition of DRG neuronal growth cone collapse and VEGF of the chemorepellent activity of sema 3A are The that increased growth cone collapse in the of VEGF sema 3A that binding of this also functions of NP-1 that are essential for growth cone a that The biological functions of PlGF are poorly and effects of in neuronal cells have not much The that PlGF-2 had a effect in DRG similar to the effect of VEGF, indicates that PlGF biological effects of and the the that PlGF acting through NP-1 have neurotrophic in The most biological role for NP-1 is in mediating effects of sema 3A in neuronal but NP-1 a variety of that biological effects to of sema 3A and is also to VEGF, a it is that the function of NP-1 is not to in of the is that NP-1 is a receptor of mediating chemorepellent activity outgrowth on the Neuropilins are not thought to to a biological partly of the of signaling in NP-1 and A is for sema growth cone collapse L. S. H. He Z. H. Chedotal A. Goodman C.S. M. Tessier-Lavigne M. Cell. 1999; 99: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), of the involved in mediating the chemorepellent activity of sema 3A has VEGF and PlGF-2 prevented growth cone collapse NP-1 in the of KDR and Flt-1 receptors, it is these are acting to collapse are an signaling NP-1 that promotes The that VEGF stimulated growth cone activity in the of other that NP-1 a VEGF signaling response to inhibition of growth cone but both the of this response and VEGF binding to NP-1 is to a biological in DRG neurons remain to for of VEGF DRG neuronal signaling are and a identified domain protein, binds to a domain binding in NP-1 H. J. Neurosci. 1999; 19: PubMed Google Scholar). The results of this also a role for prostanoids in mediating in DRG receptors for and receptors for and are expressed in DRG neurons M.R. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, H. T. Y. F. H. A. S. J. 1995; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), and prostacyclin analogues and and a variety of in including production M.R. J. Neurosci. 1995; PubMed Google Scholar), to M. J. 1994; Scopus Google Scholar, M.R. J. Neurosci. 1994; PubMed Google Scholar), and M.R. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M.R. J. Neurosci. 1995; PubMed Google Scholar, M.R. J. Neurosci. 1994; PubMed Google Scholar). prostanoids are thought to have roles in the of and P. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), and mice impaired and T. F. T. Hirata M. A. Y. A. Y. T. N. A. S. S. 1997; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). VEGF induces production in endothelial cells extracellular signal-regulated activation of C. Abu-Ghazaleh R. Cospedal R. Houliston R.A. Martin J. Zachary I. FEBS Lett. 1997; 420: 28-32Crossref PubMed Scopus (238) Google Scholar) and of G.L. S. R. M. J. Med. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), and and other prostaglandins have been in mediating biological to VEGF, including increased and angiogenesis T. M. Y. D. A. 1998; 97: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, H. T. S.K. S.K. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). DRG neurons production of that was blocked by inhibitors, that growth are of production and with the that DRG growth high levels of the for P. J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In and PlGF-2 production in DRG neuronal The inhibition of the effects of VEGF by inhibitors indicates that this neuronal response to VEGF is on inhibitors also increased growth cone collapse in the of sema 3A, that production also play a role in the of growth cone The that prostanoids play a role in outgrowth of DRG neurons is by the inhibition of growth cone collapse and increased growth cone by a variety of specific and The inhibition of the in growth cone collapse by inhibitors of indicates that and NP-1 has been to as a for VEGF165 in endothelial cells, and NP-1 is for vascular of the role of this receptor in biological functions of VEGF has The results a specific role for NP-1 in mediating effects of VEGF in DRG neurons of The antagonist of VEGF binding to NP-1, EG3287, a for the role of NP-1 in biological functions of VEGF more findings also a role for prostanoids in the of growth cone collapse that is essential for the of these findings for the mechanisms underlying neuronal functions of VEGF, the function of NP-1, and
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: