PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 9, 2012Drug and Alcohol Review218 citationsOpen Access

Patterns of synthetic cannabinoid use in Australia

View Full Paper
MBMonica J. BarrattVCVince CakicSLSimon Lenton

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: To assess the demographic profile, use patterns, market characteristics, reasons for first use and self-reported harms associated with use of synthetic cannabinoids in Australia. DESIGN AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was administered to a purposive sample of 316 Australian synthetic cannabinoid users 96% cannabis users, 77% male, median age 27 years, interquartile range (IQR) 23-34 who self-reported demographic and drug use characteristics. RESULTS: The median duration of synthetic cannabinoid use was 6 months (IQR 2-10), 35% reported use weekly or more often and 7% reported daily use. Reasons for first use included curiosity (50%), legality (39%), availability (23%), recreational effects (20%), therapeutic effects (9%), non-detection in standard drug screening assays (8%) and to aid the reduction or cessation of cannabis use (5%). Users reported buying a median of 3 g (IQR 3-6) and paying a median of AU60 (IQR 37-90). Most (68%) reported at least one side-effect during their last session of use, including decreased motor co-ordination (39%), fast or irregular heartbeat (33%), dissociation (22%), dizziness (20%), paranoia (18%) and psychosis (4%). 4 respondents reported seeking help. A greater number of side-effects were reported by males, those aged 18-25 years, water pipe ('bong') users and concurrent alcohol drinkers. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The sample reported first using synthetic cannabinoids due to curiosity, legality, availability, effects, non-detection in drug testing and to reduce their cannabis use. Harms were widely reported yet help-seeking was minimal. Inclusion of questions regarding synthetic cannabinoids in household surveys is warranted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barratt et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a62f7cc809dd4a9e2c1b0fdhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00519.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Medical Marijuana Initiatives2003 · 44 citations
  2. 2Spice drugs as a new trend: Mode of action, identification and legislation2010 · 341 citations
  3. 3Synthetic cannabinoid analogues--not repeating past mistakes.2011 · 5 citations
  4. 4Not for human consumption?: The banning of synthetic cannabinoids2011 · 4 citations
  5. 5Identifying Multiple Submissions in Internet Research: Preserving Data Integrity2008 · 181 citations