Comparison of dynamic analysis methods predicts better spin magnetizations in diluted kinetic Ising models.
We compare dynamic mean-field and dynamic cavity methods to describe the stationary states of dilute kinetic Ising models. We compute dynamic mean-field theory by expanding in interaction strength to third order, and we compare to the exact dynamic mean-field theory for fully asymmetric networks. We show that in diluted networks, the dynamic cavity method generally predicts magnetizations of individual spins better than both first-order ("naive") and second-order ("TAP") dynamic mean-field theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aurell et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: