Investigates microstructure and fracture reliability of solder joints, indicating Cu-Zn may perform better than ENIG surface finish.
The interfacial microstructure evolution and high-speed ball shear reliability of SAC305 (Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu)/Cu-20wt%Zn solder joints were systematically investigated after isothermal aging at 180 °C for up to 250 h. SAC305/electroless nickel immersion gold (ENIG) joints were used as a comparative reference. Unlike prior studies that benchmarked Cu-Zn against bare Cu, this work directly compares the two systems, establishing ENIG as the industrially relevant reference. Cu6(Sn,Zn)5 was identified as the dominant intermetallic compound (IMC) phase at the SAC305/Cu-Zn interface by SEM/EDS analysis. At the SAC305/ENIG interface, (Cu,Ni)6Sn5 formed as the dominant IMC phase, accompanied by a P-rich layer at the (Cu,Ni)6Sn5/Ni(P) boundary. The IMC thickness of SAC305/Cu-Zn joints increased from approximately 2.50 μm in the as-reflowed condition to 3.41 μm at 250 h, consistently exceeding that of SAC305/ENIG joints (1.94–2.25 μm) throughout aging. Despite this, the high-speed ball shear strength of SAC305/Cu-Zn joints was equivalent or superior to that of SAC305/ENIG joints at all aging durations. Fractographic analysis confirmed that the P-rich layer in ENIG joints acted as a preferential crack propagation path under impact loading, driving the brittle fracture ratio to approximately 75% at 250 h—compared to approximately 47% in SAC305/Cu-Zn joints. These results demonstrate that Cu-Zn electroplated from a neutral pyrophosphate-based bath constitutes a highly reliable wetting layer, offering impact reliability equivalent or superior to that of the conventional ENIG surface finish.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: