Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study integrates hazard data to assess building vulnerability in Charleston County, supporting risk management.
Charleston County, South Carolina, is home to more than 400,000 residents and is exposed to coastal erosion, sea-level rise, flooding, hurricanes, earthquake shaking, and ground instability. These hazards threaten a rapidly expanding built environment that includes historic structures dating to the eighteenth century. This study integrates parcel-level building data with environmental hazard measures to develop a Total Hazards Assessment for every building in Charleston County. The resulting geospatial index and map identify the relative susceptibility of structures to hazard-induced degradation and provide a countywide basis for comparing risk. Approximately one-third of assessed structures exhibit high or very high susceptibility. The assessment offers city planners, emergency managers, and other decision-makers an evidence-based resource for identifying priority areas, targeting mitigation investments, and strengthening preparedness and recovery planning. By translating multiple hazard datasets into a building-level cartographic product, the study supports more strategic management of both chronic and catastrophic risks across Charleston County.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rivet et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: