Demonstrates enhanced plugging and strength retention in CCUS wells, indicating effective remediation solutions.
For casing damage phenomena including casing corrosion, rupture, and seal failure that frequently occur in carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) injection-production wells under long-term gas injection and pressure fluctuations, combined with the characteristics of ultra-fine cement slurry such as concentrated hydration heat release and vulnerability to acidic environment corrosion, this study synthesized tartaric acid-intercalated Mg-Al layered double hydroxides (TA-LDHs) through ion-exchange reaction as a functional retarder, and focused on screening the water–cement ratio as well as the dosages of fluid loss additive and dispersant suitable for CCUS working conditions. The results demonstrate that at a water–cement ratio of 0.7 with 1.5% fluid loss additive TSJ-1, 0.4% dispersant FSJ-1, and 0.2% TA-LDHs retarder, the cement slurry presents excellent rheological properties, a short thickening transition time, and remarkable resistance to acidic environment erosion. Plugging performance evaluations reveal that under simulated formation water conditions, the system maintains a breakthrough pressure gradient above 90.5 MPa·m−1 and a plugging efficiency of more than 99%, and after 30 days of curing, its compressive strength reaches 29 MPa while the plugging efficiency is improved to 99.37%. Furthermore, after exposure to CO2-saturated simulated formation brine at 80 °C and 20 MPa for 30 days, the TA-LDHs-modified cement exhibited a compressive strength of 27.0 MPa and a strength retention of 93.1%, while its permeability increased by only 23.1%. In comparison, the compressive strength retention of the control cement was 80.8%, and its permeability increased by 138.5%. These results indicate that the TA-LDHs-modified ultra-fine cement possesses favorable plugging performance and improved resistance to CO2-induced degradation, showing potential for casing damage remediation in CCUS wells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: