This article explores children's views on sexual consent practices, revealing complex discourses in early childhood education.
In recent years, consent has become central to social and educational debate in Spain. However, consent in early childhood remains a controversial area, particularly concerning genital touching among peers. This article explores the narratives of 4- to 7-year-old children about these practices, drawing on 20 focus groups conducted in eight schools in the province of Barcelona (2022–2025). From a feminist new materialist perspective, we understand sexuality as a discursive-material assemblage and employ the concept of ‘thing-power’ to analyse how school objects – a gate, a poster – exercise agency in the production of (im)possibilities for childhood consent. The findings reveal the coexistence of two discourses: a dominant one (‘You cannot touch’) and an emergent one (‘Yes, with permission’), which often arises in intra-action with the researchers’ questions. In contrast to restrictive approaches based on surveillance and prohibition – which confine these practices to secrecy and guilt, hindering the detection of abuse – children produce lines of flight, such as a ‘penis–vulva’ game mediated by underwear, which temporarily deterritorialise the norm without openly confronting it. Talking about these practices with children opens up possibilities for adult support that mere prohibition forecloses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Estel Malgosa (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: