Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates b-solutions effectiveness in reducing cross-border environmental barriers, suggesting broader impact is needed.
This paper discusses the EU b-solutions initiative’s contribution to mitigating persistent environmentally related cross-border barriers in several EU cross-border regions. Launched by the European Commission in 2018 as a concrete pilot initiative to identify continuing legal and administrative obstacles, b-solutions has been implemented via more than 190 cases. These have included specific actions to reduce environmentally related cross-border barriers, particularly in policy domains such as the circular economy, energy, biodiversity, environmental, water and risk management, sustainable mobility, food systems, pollution, and sustainable urbanization. Approximately one in five b-solutions cases has been dedicated to mitigating environmental cross-border barriers, in line with the European Green Deal. They have delivered positive impacts in stimulating cross-border cooperation processes, specifically in cross-border circular economy, energy, water and risk management; and in stimulating further approaches by other cross-border regions. However, to have a broader and more sustained positive impact on reducing persistent cross-border environmental barriers in the EU, b-solutions is not enough to address the ‘Green’ domain more consistently. Border regions should establish cross-border strategic frameworks with their neighbours and set clear roadmaps. And mainstream policies should also consider cross-border realities and consequences, and a climate change narrative can be drawn from the analysed cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramírez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: