Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective evaluation reports safety and diagnostic yield of robotic-assisted biopsies for lung mass lesions, suggesting a reliable option.
OBJECTIVE: F-FDG PET-CT) integrates functional and anatomical imaging. This study assessed the safety and diagnostic yield of PET-CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy for intrathoracic mass lesions using a semi-automatic robotic system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: III; Perfint Healthcare Pvt Ltd., Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India), consisting of docking system, digital screen and a stereotactic arm. Clinicodemographic profile, PET-CT and biopsy findings, histopathology reports, and complications were retrieved from patient records. RESULTS: F-FDG uptake was noted in 97.5% (n = 39). The average target lesion distance was 40±12.7 mm. At least four biopsy cores were obtained in all patients except one. Core length was 2 cm in 90% of cases. The most common complication was local pain, followed by pneumothorax in 12.5% (n = 5). Tissue was adequate for analysis in all cases. None of the patients had to undergo repeat PET-CT or biopsy. The diagnostic yield was 100%, with malignancy in 82.5% (n = 33), acute inflammation in 10% (n = 4), and tuberculosis in 7.5% (n = 3). 50% (n = 20) underwent next-generation sequencing for targeted mutation testing. CONCLUSION: Semiautomatic robotic assistance can be a safe option for diagnosing intrathoracic mass lesions, with an acceptable diagnostic yield.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravina et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: