Evaluates sweet spot prediction in mixed tight oil reservoirs, indicating effective well placement.
Sweet spot prediction in saline lacustrine mixed tight oil reservoirs is challenging. This study evaluates the P2l22-3 (PL23) member of the Lucaogou Formation in the Jimusaer Sag using organic geochemistry, XRD, thin sections, FE-SEM, core analysis, and NMR logging. The three sub-layers share similar source-rock conditions (good–excellent TOC, type I–II kerogen, mature), implying organic geochemistry does not cause reservoir-quality differences. Reservoir heterogeneity is controlled by lithofacies, clay mineral assemblages, and pore connectivity. Sub-layer 2 is the best interval, with highest movable porosity (4.63%), oil saturation (79.14%), superior NMR permeability, and good pay continuity. High-quality porosity comprises intergranular, dissolution, and microfracture pores in silty-fine sandstone and dolomitic siltstone. In contrast, smectite enrichment and poorly connected nano- to submicron pores reduce sub-layer 3 quality. Movable porosity is key; a classification integrating movable fluid parameters, type I movable pay thickness, and movable oil reserve abundance supports well placement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: