Randomized trial investigates Ramsey number R(J4,J8), highlighting progress on unresolved roots.
Let Jₜ=Kₜ-e, with ordinary subgraph containment. We consolidate a seven-phase investigation of the unresolved Ramsey number R(J₄,J₈). The published, fully checkable interval remains 30≤ R(J₄,J₈)≤32. A corrected two-pivot reduction sends every hypothetical graph of order $30$ or $31$ to one of $359$ strengthened arithmetic roots and a terminal graph in R(J₄,J₆;s) with s≤16. We give a directly verified $29$-vertex lower-bound graph, exact attachment-profile criteria, cross-level capacity and defect identities, and band-specific obstruction and lifting theorems. Clean-room generation reproduces the complete terminal censuses at orders $10$, $11$, $12$, $15$, and $16$; in particular the order-$15$ census has 20,266 canonical members and zero failures under independent membership checks. The main new human theorem proves that no graph in R(J₄,J₈;31) has minimum degree $11$; together with a binary rigidity theorem at order $30$, this gives human terminals for all eighteen original degree-eleven roots. Earlier exhaustive research computations remove $32$ further roots, but their negative leaves do not yet carry publication-grade proof objects. The current research frontier is therefore $309$ roots, while $341=309+32$ roots remain unresolved under the strict clean-room standard. Two independent exact encodings report that the stored $29$-vertex witness has no one-vertex extension; without a checked refutation and a classification of all order-$29$ graphs, this is evidence rather than an order-$30$ theorem. Thus the present paper records a certified structural advance and a reproducible proof architecture, not an exact-value claim.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo Chen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: