Evaluates cement substitution with waste materials in composites, suggesting sustainable construction improvement.
The partial replacement of cement with waste-derived materials is a promising strategy for reducing cement consumption in soil–cement technologies and developing more sustainable construction materials. This study investigates fluidized bed bottom ash (BA), an industrial combustion by-product, as a partial Portland cement substitute in geotechnical cement–soil composites. Cement was replaced with BA at 5%, 10%, and 15% by mass, and specimens were tested after 3, 7, 14, and 28 days of curing. The research program combined SEM-EDS characterization, high-resolution X-ray computed tomography, uniaxial compression tests, in situ CT observations during loading, and FLAC3D mesoscale numerical modelling calibrated against experimental stress–strain curves and observed crack propagation. The results showed a non-monotonic effect of BA addition. Up to 10% BA, the median pore size remained relatively stable, whereas 15% BA increased porosity and enlarged the upper tail of the pore-size distribution. The calibrated model reproduced the global mechanical response with acceptable accuracy and captured main features of damage localization. The analyses are accompanied by a life cycle assessment (LCA). The study demonstrates that waste-modified cement–soil composites intended for sustainable soil stabilization should be evaluated not only by strength parameters, but also by internal structure, defect distribution, and environmental impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaczmarczyk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: