Demonstrates improved control in scrubber systems, indicating safety and operational efficiency.
In scrubbing tower (ST) systems, outlet vapor temperature regulation is subject to strict thermal constraints, requiring the bottom temperature to remain below a critical safety threshold. Transient overshoots can rapidly trigger pyrolytic coking, foul mass-transfer packed beds and spray nozzles, and ultimately force complete production shutdowns. Due to feedstock compositional drifts, high thermal inertia, and significant transport delays, high-fidelity predictive identification is essential for proactive early warning and for overcoming the limitations of reactive feedback control. To address these bottlenecks, this paper introduces an offset-free, hard-constrained, data-driven adaptive optimal control paradigm, designated as the improved GRU-coupled conjugate gradient linear quadratic regulator (IGRUCG-LQR). First, by constructing an augmented state space embedded with integral error, the proposed paradigm eliminates permanent tracking offsets induced by long-term nonstationary drifts. Second, automatic differentiation is used to extract the time-varying Jacobian matrix of a gated recurrent unit (GRU) online, thereby tracking the nonlinear evolution of the underlying thermodynamic baseline with high fidelity. To manage the critical trade-off between strict actuator saturation and short real-time sampling intervals, the conjugate gradient (CG) method is fused with a hard-boundary projection operator, enforcing physical constraints with high computational efficiency and without complex matrix inversions. Experimental validation on a real-world industrial dataset demonstrates that the proposed paradigm secures the safety baseline while achieving high-resolution transient tracking. Furthermore, it significantly suppresses high-frequency valve chattering to mitigate mechanical fatigue, establishing a solid theoretical and engineering foundation for the prolonged stable operation of safety-critical processes. The proposed framework achieves an Integral Absolute Error (IAE) of 86.66 and an Integral Time Absolute Error (ITAE) of 4064.49.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: