Investigates corticospinal changes post-HIIT and strength exercise, suggesting different neurorehabilitation strategies.
High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and strength exercise (SE) induce corticospinal plasticity in exercised and non-exercised muscles. While HIIT's systemic neuromodulatory effects are well-established, SE's comparable remote responses remain unclear. This study investigated changes in corticospinal, intracortical, and spinal excitability, as well as motor performance, in non-exercised flexor carpi radialis following single-session HIIT and plantar flexion SE. Using a randomised crossover design, eighteen participants completed: (1) 20-minute high-intensity interval cycling, (2) high-intensity resistive plantar flexion, and (3) control. Corticospinal responses were assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation; motor performance through reaction time tasks and maximum voluntary force at baseline and post-exercise. Only HIIT significantly increased motor-evoked potential amplitude (p = 0.002) and reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition (p = 0.04). HIIT reduced silent period duration compared to baseline and control (p <0.001), while SE showed reduction only versus control (p <0.001). Both HIIT and SE improved reaction time compared to baseline and control (p <0.05). These findings highlight differential corticospinal responses in a remote, non-exercised muscle, with HIIT inducing distributed excitability enhancements compared to SE. Unilateral, small-muscle SE may be insufficient to induce widespread corticospinal excitability changes, with implications for neurorehabilitation strategies targeting remote muscle groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rostami et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: