Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates effective vulnerability detection in software, suggesting improved accuracy with advanced techniques.
Software vulnerability detection increasingly relies on learning-based models. However, most existing methods analyze individual functions in isolation, making it difficult to capture vulnerabilities caused by cross-function calls; directly introducing complete call chains can also lead to context expansion and noise accumulation. This paper proposes VulRESC, a vulnerability detection framework based on risk path extraction and interprocedural semantic completion. The method first constructs code property graphs and extracts call paths related to external inputs and high-risk operations through a riskpoint- driven pruning strategy. It then uses large language models to generate structured summaries for callees along the sequence in a bottom-up manner and introduces a variable-name alignment mechanism to bridge the semantic gap across function boundaries. Finally, the proposed DualVulBERT dual-stream model is employed to jointly identify vulnerabilities by fusing source code features and inter-procedural semantic summaries through cross-modal attention. Experimental results on real-world C/C++ vulnerability datasets show that VulRESC achieves an accuracy of 68.03% and an F1-score of 69.37%, outperforming representative existing methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: