Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
GWP* was recently proposed 1 as a simple metric for calculating warming-equivalent emissions by equating a change in the rate of emission of a short-lived climate pollutant (SLCP) to a pulse emission of carbon dioxide. Other metrics aiming to account for the time-dependent impact of SLCP emissions, such as CGWP, have also been proposed 2 . In 2019 an improvement to GWP* was proposed by Cain et al. 3 , hereafter CLA, combining both the rate and change in rate of SLCP emission, justified by the rate of forcing decline required to stabilise temperatures following a recent multi-decade emissions increase. Here we provide a more direct justification of the coefficients used in this definition of GWP*, with a small revision to their absolute values, by equating CO 2 and SLCP forcing directly, without reference to the temperature response. This provides a more direct link to the impulse-response model used to calculate GWP values and improves consistency with CGWP values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: