Key result
Parenclitic deviations along the albumin-prothrombin time axis predicted 12-month mortality in patients with cirrhosis independent of the MELD score (HR 1.138).
Why the study?
Mapping individual functional connectivity in cirrhosis has been challenging due to a lack of suitable analytical methods, prompting assessment of parenclitic networks to predict survival.
Does a parenclitic network approach predict 12-month survival better than MELD alone in patients with cirrhosis?
Cohort (n=106)
No
Does a parenclitic network approach predict 12-month survival better than MELD alone in patients with cirrhosis?
A parenclitic network approach using routine clinical variables can predict 12-month survival in cirrhosis patients independent of and better than the MELD score.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Parenclitic networks predict survival in cirrhosis; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Background: Liver cirrhosis involves multiple organ systems and has a high mortality. A network approach to complex diseases often reveals the collective system behaviours and intrinsic interactions between organ systems. However, mapping the functional connectivity for each individual patient has been challenging due to the lack of suitable analytical methods for assessment of physiological networks. In the present study we applied a parenclitic approach to assess the physiological network of each individual patient from routine clinical/laboratory data available. We aimed to assess the value of the parenclitic networks to predict survival in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: Parenclitic approach creates a network from the perspective of an individual subject in a population. In this study such an approach was used to measure the deviation of each individual patient from the existing network of physiological interactions in a reference population of patients with cirrhosis. 106 patients with cirrhosis were retrospectively enrolled and followed up for 12 months. Network construction and analysis were performed using data from seven clinical/laboratory variables (serum albumin, bilirubin, creatinine, ammonia, sodium, prothrombin time and hepatic encephalopathy) for calculation of parenclitic deviations. Cox regression was used for survival analysis. Result: Initial network analysis indicated that correlation between five clinical/laboratory variables can distinguish between survivors and non-survivors in this cohort. Parenclitic deviations along albumin-bilirubin (Hazard ratio = 1.063, p < 0.05) and albumin-prothrombin time (Hazard ratio = 1.138, p < 0.05) predicted 12-month survival independent of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Combination of MELD with the parenclitic measures could predict survival better than MELD alone. Conclusion: The parenclitic network approach can predict survival of patients with cirrhosis and provides pathophysiologic insight on network disruption in chronic liver disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Cirrhosis (n=106). Parenclitic deviations along albumin-prothrombin time axis vs. Lower parenclitic deviations was evaluated on 12-month mortality (HR 1.138, 95% CI 1.012-1.280, p=0.031). Parenclitic deviations along the albumin-prothrombin time axis predicted 12-month mortality in patients with cirrhosis independent of the MELD score (HR 1.138).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: