Key result
Digital artery calcification significantly reduced 1-year major adverse limb event-free survival (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.68-3.73).
Why the study?
Toe pressure is preferred over ABI due to presumed lower susceptibility to digital artery calcification, but recent studies show digital artery calcification is prevalent in CLTI, prompting examination of its influence on measured toe pressure.
Does digital artery calcification affect toe pressure measurements and 1-year MALE in patients suspected of CLTI?
Cohort (n=382)
No
Does digital artery calcification affect toe pressure measurements and 1-year MALE in patients suspected of CLTI?
Hazard Ratio: 2.51 (95% CI 1.68–3.73)
In patients with suspected CLTI, digital artery calcification is common and associated with worse outcomes, suggesting that 20-30 mmHg should be subtracted from toe pressure measurements when medial arterial calcification is present on X-ray.
May require cautious toe pressure interpretation in calcified vessels; leaves open whether adjusted thresholds improve CLTI risk stratification.
Background In patients suspected for Peripheral Arterial Disease, and who are at risk for arterial calcification, measurement of the Toe Pressure (TP) is preferred over Ankle Brachial Index, due to an alleged reduced susceptibility for calcification in the digital arteries. Recent studies however have shown that calcification of digital arteries is prevalent in Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia (CLTI) patients. This study examines the influence of digital artery calcification in suspected CLTI on the measured toe pressure. Methods Single center, retrospective analysis of patients reporting to a multidisciplinary vascular clinic. All patients had bilateral toe pressure measurements, and patients without X rays of the foot were excluded. Cox proportional hazard modelling was performed for 1 year major adverse limb events (MALE) between patients with- and without digital artery calcification. Propensity Score Matching was performed to create comparable groups of patients with- and without digital artery calcification, and included known confounders for the presence of digital artery calcification. Toe pressure was plotted against a calculated probability of 1 year MALE-free survival for both matched groups. Results Four-hundred-ninety-four limbs in 382 patients were included, of which 143 had radiographical signs of digital artery calcifications (28.9%), and 351 (71.1%) had not. Digital artery calcification had a 2.51 Hazard Ratio (95C CI: 1.68-3.73) for MALE-free survival. One-hundred-sixty-five patients were matched. Probability of 1-year MALE-free survival increased with decreasing systolic toe pressure in both calcified and non-calcified digital arteries. Overall, a 20-30 mmHg difference between groups is visualized for each estimate of risk. Conclusion Calcification of the arteries of the first toe is present in 27.2% of patients, which significantly reduces MALE-free survival, with a hazard ratio of 2.5. For an adequate assessment of ischemia risk, when Medial Arterial Calcification (MAC) is present in X-ray imaging of the foot, we advise to subtract 20-30 mmHg of the toe pressure measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Welling et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Suspected Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia (CLTI) (n=382). Digital artery calcification vs. No digital artery calcification was evaluated on 1-year major adverse limb events (MALE)-free survival (HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.68-3.73). Digital artery calcification significantly reduced 1-year major adverse limb event-free survival (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.68-3.73).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: