Key result
Syncope during effort independently predicted bradycardia (OR 3.41; 95% CI 1.21-9.6; p=0.02), while palpitations and history of atrial fibrillation predicted supraventricular tachycardia.
Why the study?
Predictors for bradycardia and SVT that necessitate therapy in patients with unexplained syncope receiving ICMs are not well known.
What are the clinical predictors for bradycardia and SVT necessitating therapy in patients with unexplained syncope monitored by ICM?
Observational (n=132)
What are the clinical predictors for bradycardia and SVT necessitating therapy in patients with unexplained syncope monitored by ICM?
Clinical features such as syncope during effort, palpitations, and history of atrial fibrillation can help predict which patients with unexplained syncope will require therapy for bradycardia or SVT detected by ICM.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Effort syncope may warrant bradycardia-focused evaluation; hypothesis-generating for arrhythmia predictors and needs prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) improve diagnostic yield in patients with unexplained syncope. The most of cardiac syncope is arrhythmic causes include paroxysmal bradycardia and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in patients with unexplained syncope receiving ICM. Predictors for bradycardia and SVT that necessitate therapy in patients with unexplained syncope are not well known. HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to investigate predictors of bradycardia and SVT necessitating therapy in patients with unexplained syncope receiving ICMs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of consecutive patients who received ICMs to monitor unexplained syncope. We performed Cox's stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify significant independent predictors for bradycardia and SVT. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients received ICMs to monitor unexplained syncope. During the 17-month follow-up period, 19 patients (14%) needed pacemaker therapy for bradycardia; 8 patients (6%) received catheter ablation for SVT. The total estimated diagnostic rates were 34% and 48% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Stepwise logistic regression analysis indicated that syncope during effort (odds ratio [OR] = 3.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 to 9.6; p = .02) was an independent predictor for bradycardia. Palpitation before syncope (OR = 9.46; 95% CI, 1.78 to 50.10; p = .008) and history of atrial fibrillation (OR = 10.1; 95% CI, 1.96 to 52.45; p = .006) were identified as significant independent predictors for SVT. CONCLUSION: Syncope during effort, and palpitations or history of atrial fibrillation were independent predictors for bradycardia and for SVT. ICMs are useful devices for diagnosing unexplained syncope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Onuki et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Unexplained syncope (n=132). Clinical predictors (syncope during effort, palpitations, history of atrial fibrillation) was evaluated on Bradycardia necessitating therapy (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.21 to 9.6, p=.02). Syncope during effort independently predicted bradycardia (OR 3.41; 95% CI 1.21-9.6; p=0.02), while palpitations and history of atrial fibrillation predicted supraventricular tachycardia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: