Key result
Hourly resistance exercise breaks did not significantly improve 4-hour glucose AUC compared to prolonged sitting (β = -0.35 mmol/L, p=0.278), but attenuated 1-hour postprandial glucose.
Why the study?
Interrupting prolonged sitting with light activity improves cardiometabolic outcomes, but less is known about the impact of resistance exercise breaks.
Do hourly resistance exercise breaks improve acute cardiometabolic outcomes compared to prolonged sitting in adults?
RCT (n=14)
randomized
Do hourly resistance exercise breaks improve acute cardiometabolic outcomes compared to prolonged sitting in adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hourly resistance exercise breaks during prolonged sitting attenuate 1-hour postprandial glucose but do not significantly improve 4-hour glucose AUC, triglycerides, or blood pressure.
Interrupting prolonged sitting with light activity breaks, such as short walks, improves cardiometabolic outcomes, yet less is known about the impact of resistance exercise breaks. This study examined the effects of hourly, guidelines-based simple resistance exercise breaks on acute cardiometabolic health outcomes over a simulated work period. Fourteen adults (age: 53.4 ± 9.5 years, body mass index: 30.9 ± 4.8 kg/m 2 ) completed 2 randomized 4-h conditions: prolonged sitting (SIT) and hourly resistance exercise breaks (REX). Glucose, triglycerides, blood pressure, and heart rate were measured at baseline and then hourly. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) was measured before and after each condition. Linear mixed models evaluated overall condition effects and differences at each hour. Cohen’s d estimated magnitude of effects. Four-hour glucose area under the curve (AUC) did not differ by condition (REX vs. SIT: β = –0.35 mmol/L, p = 0.278, d = 0.51). However, an attenuation of postprandial glucose at 1 h (β = –0.69 mg/dL, p = 0.004, d = 1.02) in REX compared with SIT was observed. Triglyceride AUC, mean blood pressure, and PWV did not differ significantly between REX and SIT overall or any time point (all p > 0.05). Heart rate was higher across the experimental period in REX versus SIT (β = 3.3 bpm, p < 0.001, d = 0.35) and individual time points (β ≥ 3.2 bpm, p ≤ 0.044, d ≥ 0.34). Resistance exercise breaks can potentially improve 1-h postprandial glucose, but may not acutely benefit other cardiometabolic outcomes. Future studies employing guidelines-based resistance exercises to interrupt prolonged sitting with a larger sample and longer follow-up are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kowalsky et al. (2019) reported an RCT. Hourly resistance exercise breaks vs. Prolonged sitting was evaluated on Four-hour glucose area under the curve (AUC) (β = -0.35 mmol/L, p=0.278). Hourly resistance exercise breaks did not significantly improve 4-hour glucose AUC compared to prolonged sitting (β = -0.35 mmol/L, p=0.278), but attenuated 1-hour postprandial glucose.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: