Key result
The proposed Indices-Net achieved a low estimation error for LV wall thicknesses (1.44 mm), significantly outperforming the segmentation method with a 55.1% error reduction.
Why the study?
Does Indices-Net improve the accuracy of multitype cardiac indices estimation from cardiac MR images compared to segmentation and two-phase direct volume-only methods?
Does Indices-Net improve the accuracy of multitype cardiac indices estimation from cardiac MR images compared to segmentation and two-phase direct volume-only methods?
Effect estimate: 55.1% error reduction vs segmentation method
Absolute Event Rate: 1.44% vs 3.21%
p-value: p=<0.01
The proposed Indices-Net deep learning method significantly reduces estimation errors for cardiac indices from MR images compared to traditional segmentation and volume-only methods.
Supports integrated DL models for direct multitype cardiac index estimation from CMR; leaves open prospective clinical validation before adoption.
Cardiac indices estimation is of great importance during identification and diagnosis of cardiac disease in clinical routine. However, estimation of multitype cardiac indices with consistently reliable and high accuracy is still a great challenge due to the high variability of cardiac structures and the complexity of temporal dynamics in cardiac MR sequences. While efforts have been devoted into cardiac volumes estimation through feature engineering followed by a independent regression model, these methods suffer from the vulnerable feature representation and incompatible regression model. In this paper, we propose a semi-automated method for multitype cardiac indices estimation. After the manual labeling of two landmarks for ROI cropping, an integrated deep neural network Indices-Net is designed to jointly learn the representation and regression models. It comprises two tightly-coupled networks, such as a deep convolution autoencoder for cardiac image representation, and a multiple output convolution neural network for indices regression. Joint learning of the two networks effectively enhances the expressiveness of image representation with respect to cardiac indices, and the compatibility between image representation and indices regression, thus leading to accurate and reliable estimations for all the cardiac indices. When applied with five-fold cross validation on MR images of 145 subjects, Indices-Net achieves consistently low estimation error for LV wall thicknesses (1.44 ± 0.71 mm) and areas of cavity and myocardium (204 ± 133 mm 2 ). It outperforms, with significant error reductions, segmentation method (55.1% and 17.4%), and two-phase direct volume-only methods (12.7% and 14.6%) for wall thicknesses and areas, respectively. These advantages endow the proposed method a great potential in clinical cardiac function assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xue et al. (2017) studied Cardiac disease (Cardiac MR imaging) (n=145). Indices-Net (Deep neural network) vs. Segmentation method (Max Flow) and two-phase direct methods was evaluated on Mean absolute error (MAE) for LV wall thicknesses (linear indices) (55.1% error reduction vs segmentation method, p=<0.01). The proposed Indices-Net achieved a low estimation error for LV wall thicknesses (1.44 mm), significantly outperforming the segmentation method with a 55.1% error reduction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: