Key result
Auditing delays and disseminating the results significantly decreased delays (p=0.001) and median waiting times for urgent surgery (p<0.01) compared to the first audit cycle.
Why the study?
Does auditing and disseminating results of delays reduce waiting times for urgent surgery?
Does auditing and disseminating results of delays reduce waiting times for urgent surgery?
Auditing delays and disseminating the results significantly decreases delays and median waiting times for urgent surgery by improving surgical availability.
May support local audit cycles to cut urgent surgery delays; leaves open generalizability and causality.
National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death guidelines for urgent surgery recommend a fully staffed emergency operating theatre and restriction of 'after-midnight' operating to immediate life-, limb- or organ-threatening conditions. Audit performed in our institution demonstrated significant decreases in waiting times for urgent surgery and an increased seniority of medical care associated with overnight pre-operative assessment of patients by anaesthetic trainees. Nevertheless, urgent cases continued to be delayed unnecessarily. A classification of delays was developed from existing guidelines and their incidence was audited. The results were disseminated to involved directorates. A repeat of the audit demonstrated a significant decrease in delays (p = 0.001), a significant increase in the availability of surgeons (p = 0.001) and a significant decrease in the median waiting time for urgent surgery compared to the first audit cycle and a previous standard (p < 0.01). We conclude that auditing delays and disseminating the results of the audit significantly decreases delays and median waiting times for urgent surgery because of improved surgical availability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cosgrove et al. (2008) studied Urgent and expedited surgery. Auditing delays and disseminating results vs. First audit cycle and previous standard was evaluated on Delays in urgent surgery (p=0.001). Auditing delays and disseminating the results significantly decreased delays (p=0.001) and median waiting times for urgent surgery (p<0.01) compared to the first audit cycle.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: