PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 2009The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research189 citations

Acute Effects of Blood Flow Restriction on Muscle Activity and Endurance During Fatiguing Dynamic Knee Extensions at Low Load

View Full Paper
MWMathias WernbomRJRickard JärrebringMAMikael A Andreasson

Key Result

Blood flow restriction during low-intensity dynamic knee extension decreased endurance (p<0.05) but did not increase maximum muscle activity compared with training without restriction.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=11)

Randomization

Within-subject randomization

Structured PICO

Does blood flow restriction during low-intensity dynamic knee extension alter muscle activity and endurance in healthy subjects?

P
Population
11 healthy subjects with strength training experience who performed 3 sets of unilateral knee extensions to failure.
I
Intervention
3 sets of unilateral knee extensions with no relaxation between repetitions to concentric torque failure at 30% of the 1 repetition maximum with blood flow restriction (cuff occlusion)
C
Comparator
3 sets of unilateral knee extensions with no relaxation between repetitions to concentric torque failure at 30% of the 1 repetition maximum without blood flow restriction (nonoccluded leg)
O
Outcome
Muscle activity in the quadriceps recorded with electromyography (EMG) and endurance (number of repetitions)surrogate

Blood flow restriction during low-intensity knee extensions to failure decreases endurance without increasing maximal muscle activity, and is associated with ischemic muscle pain.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.05

Limitations

  • Associated with ischemic muscle pain, which may limit its applications to highly motivated individuals.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate muscle activity and endurance during fatiguing low-intensity dynamic knee extension exercise with and without blood flow restriction. Eleven healthy subjects with strength training experience performed 3 sets of unilateral knee extensions with no relaxation between repetitions to concentric torque failure at 30% of the 1 repetition maximum. One leg was randomized to exercise with cuff occlusion and the other leg to exercise without occlusion. The muscle activity in the quadriceps was recorded with electromyography (EMG). Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and acute pain were collected immediately, and delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) was rated before and at 24, 48, and 72 hours after exercise. The results demonstrated high EMG levels in both experimental conditions, but there were no significant differences regarding maximal muscle activity, except for a higher EMG in the eccentric phase in set 3 for the nonoccluded condition (p = 0.005). Significantly more repetitions were performed with the nonoccluded leg in every set (p < 0.05). The RPE and acute pain ratings were similar, but DOMS was higher in the nonoccluded leg (p < 0.05). We conclude that blood flow restriction during low-intensity dynamic knee extension decreases the endurance but does not increase the maximum muscle activity compared with training without restriction when both regimes are performed to failure. The high levels of muscle activity suggest that performing low-load dynamic knee extensions in a no-relaxation manner may be a useful method in knee rehabilitation settings when large forces are contraindicated. However, similarly to fatiguing blood flow restricted exercise, this method is associated with ischemic muscle pain, and thus its applications may be limited to highly motivated individuals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wernbom et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Healthy subjects (n=11). Blood flow restriction (cuff occlusion) vs. Exercise without occlusion was evaluated on Muscle activity (EMG) and endurance (repetitions) (p=<0.05). Blood flow restriction during low-intensity dynamic knee extension decreased endurance (p<0.05) but did not increase maximum muscle activity compared with training without restriction.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a63a9f53eb69703d1b73052https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181bc1c2a
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper