Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The management of evisceration and enucleation has changed over time. The authors assessed the practice patterns regarding eye removal among oculoplastic surgeons. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Internet-based surveys were sent to American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons members regarding preferences in evisceration and/or enucleation, including indications, surgical techniques, preoperative evaluation modalities, implant types used, and postoperative complications experienced. RESULTS: Surgeons who recently completed fellowship training are more likely to perform eviscerations than their senior counterparts. The variety of viable implant types and the use of enucleation or evisceration for certain indications were not always in concordance with historical guiding principles. However, changing trends are in line with the current literature. CONCLUSION: Current practice patterns reflect recent literature and historical trends.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: