Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The reduction of quinone groups in humic substances by acid SnCl 2 solution was found to be unsatisfactory. The experimental conditions are drastic, the systems are heterogeneous, favoring adsorption or complexing of the reducing agent by the humic materials, and so leading to excessively high quinone values. Reduction of humic substances by SnCl 2 and Fe 2+ ‐triethanolamine in alkaline solution at room temperature and atmospheric pressure appeared to be more suitable for the determination of quinone groups in these materials. There was good agreement between quinone groups determined by the two methods on seven humic and one fulvic acid. The quinone group content of the humic acids analyzed ranged from 1.4 to 2.2 meq/g, that of the fulvic acid was < 1.0 meq/g. No correlation was found between quinone groups and the free radical content of the humic materials. The results suggest that quinone groups in humic substances form part of complex chemical structures and not of simple compounds. The determination of quinone groups in humic substances is difficult because of the presence of substantial amounts of CO 2 H, OH, and ketonic C=0 groups, some or all of which may interfere. Thus, it is advisable to check each analysis by at least two different methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schnitzer et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: