Introduction: Malocclusion adversely affects oral function and psychosocial well-being. Utility-based approaches can quantify health preferences, yet their application in routine orthodontic patients remains insufficiently explored. Materials and Methods: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the time trade-off (TTO) method for quantifying health utility values in adults with untreated malocclusions and to examine the association between TTO utilities and Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) scores. A pilot cross-sectional feasibility study was conducted on 30 adults with untreated malocclusion at a tertiary center in Delhi National Capital Region. Utility scores for current malocclusion and four hypothetical treatment scenarios were elicited using a structured TTO task. OQLQ scores were recorded across four domains. Descriptive statistics were used due to limited subgroup sizes. Results: The mean TTO utilities showed variability across age, gender, and malocclusion types but no meaningful statistical differences. OQLQ scores demonstrated greater psychosocial impact in Class II division 1 patients. Very small sample numbers in some subgroups (e.g., Class III : n = 1) precluded inferential comparisons. Conclusion: The TTO method is feasible and acceptable for use in adults seeking orthodontic care. Observed trends suggest higher perceived impact in Class II division 1 patients, but findings are exploratory only. Larger powered studies are required to validate subgroup differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vijayan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: