Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An exchange perturbation theory is developed which is identical through first order in the primitive function G with the Eisenschitz-London (EL) theory. It is shown that in higher orders, G is different from the EL primitive function and from the primitive functions of related theories. The function G is least distorted from the zeroth-order function F⁰, a product of functions for the subsystems when the interactions have been set equal to zero. The potential which distorts F⁰ into G is more thoroughly screened than in any other theory we have examined. We argue that this EL-type theory should be used when the unscreened interactions are strong.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polymeropoulos et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: