Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Extensive amounts of natural quarry aggregates are currently being used in road and pavement applications. The use of construction and demolition (C&D) materials such as recycled concrete aggregate (RCA), crushed brick (CB), and reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) as an alternative to quarry aggregates has generated interest in recent years, particularly as a pavement base or subbase material. However, the resilient moduli responses and performance of these C&D materials reinforced with geogrids under repeated loads have yet to be established. This research investigates the resilient moduli (MR) and permanent deformation characteristics of C&D materials reinforced with biaxial and triaxial geogrids with the use of repeated load triaxial (RLT) equipment. The effects of varying deviatoric stress on the resilient modulus of unreinforced and geogrid-reinforced C&D materials were also investigated. Regression analyses of resilient modulus test results were performed using the two- and three-parameter models. The MR properties of the geogrid-reinforced RCA and CB were found to be higher than that of the respective unreinforced material. The MR value of RCA+biaxial increased by 24% and of RCA+triaxial increased by 34% when compared with unreinforced RCA. The permanent deformation value obtained from RCA+biaxial decreased by 29% and of RCA+triaxial decreased by 36% when compared with unreinforced RCA. The MR value of CB+biaxial increased by 16% and of CB+triaxial increased by 55% when compared with unreinforced CB. The permanent deformation value decreased by 29 and 37% for CB+biaxial and CB+triaxial, respectively, when compared with unreinforced CB material. The incorporation of geogrids had significant effects on the resilient modulus and permanent deformation characteristics of C&D materials. The three-parameter resilient moduli model was found to provide a good fit for the geogrid-reinforced C&D materials.
Rahman et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: