The gravitational anomaly of a polyhedral target of uniform density is amenable to analytical solution and has received wide attention. We analyze a number of apparently dissimilar solutions for consistency and comment on their suitability for numeric computation. Consistency is determined by evaluating a method over a special contour for which all methods must agree. Numerical performance is assessed through operation counts and algorithm classification into vertex, line, or surface type, each type having a known accuracy bound for a given floating-point precision. We verify performance predictions through model calculations. In particular, we demonstrate the effectiveness of revised vertex and line algorithms and of a new analytical surface method. Our scheme of analysis and classification has general application. It provides criteria by which existing and novel solutions may be examined for consistency and numerical performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holstein et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: