Key result
This study protocol outlines a global survey and Delphi consensus initiative aiming to recruit at least 2,398 healthcare providers to standardize the definition, grading, and reporting of intraoperative adverse events.
Why the study?
Intraoperative adverse events remain underestimated and underreported due to a lack of standardized frameworks, inadequate reporting methods, litigation concerns, and limited adoption of grading systems.
The ICARUS initiative protocol outlines a global survey and Delphi consensus to standardize the definition, grading, and reporting of intraoperative adverse events across procedural specialties.
Supports standardized intraoperative adverse event reporting; leaves open effects on outcomes and trial comparability.
Every year, approximately 200 million surgeries are performed worldwide, and intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) have a significant impact on patients and surgeons. Despite their importance, the true scale of iAEs remains underestimated due to inadequate methods for assessment, collection, grading, and reporting. Various grading systems have been introduced over the past decade, but their adoption has been limited, leading to inconsistencies in reporting. Furthermore, a lack of standardized frameworks for defining, assessing, and collecting iAEs, coupled with litigation concerns, contributes to underreporting. Only half of surgery and anesthesiology journals provide guidance on reporting perioperative adverse events, and recommendations for reporting iAEs are notably lacking in surgical literature. To address these issues, the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standard (ICARUS) Global Surgical Collaboration was established in 2022. The initiative involves conducting global surveys and a Delphi consensus to understand the barriers for poor reporting of iAEs, validate shared criteria for reporting, define iAEs according to surgical procedures, evaluate the existing grading systems’ reliability, and identify strategies for enhancing the collection, reporting, and management of iAEs. A sample size of 2,398 respondents was calculated for the study, with invitations extended to 86,574 healthcare providers. This effort represents an essential step towards improved patient safety and the well-being of healthcare professionals in the surgical field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cacciamani et al. (2023) studied Intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) (n=2,398). ICARUS Global Cross-Specialty Surveys was evaluated on Understanding barriers for poor reporting of iAEs, validating shared criteria, defining iAEs, and evaluating grading systems' reliability. This study protocol outlines a global survey and Delphi consensus initiative aiming to recruit at least 2,398 healthcare providers to standardize the definition, grading, and reporting of intraoperative adverse events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: