In this paper we present two new results. The first concerns the proper identification of the critical Richardson number Ri(cr) above which there is no longer turbulent mixing. Thus far, all studies have assumed that: However, since (cr) determines the upper limit of a laminar regime (superscript ), it has little relevance to stars where the problem is not to determine the end point of a laminar regime but the endpoint of turbulence. We show that the latter is characterized by , where t stands for turbulence, and has a value four times larger than (1): We also show that use of (2) instead of (1) changes the conclusions of recent studies. Inclusion of radiative losses (characterized by the Peclet number Pe) which weaken stable stratification and help turbulence, further changes (2) to (r stands for radiative): which, for , allows turbulence to survive far longer than (2). Finally, turbulent convection generates gravity waves that propagate into the radiative region and act as an additional source of energy. This further changes Eq. (3) to (gw stands for gravity waves): where . In conclusion, the successive inclusion of relevant physical processes leads to a chain of increasing values of : The second result concerns the dependence of the diffusivity D on Ω. We show that the commonly used expression is not correct for the regime that characterizes a stably stratified regime. The proper Ω-dependence is:
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
V. M. Canuto (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: