Key result
This review outlines the current status, challenges, and future priorities in cardiac regenerative medicine, emphasizing the need to restore both cellular and environmental tissue architecture.
Why the study?
Cardiomyocytes make up <40% of cells in a healthy adult heart, making approaches focused solely on reconstituting cardiomyocytes ineffective for restoring disrupted cardiac tissue architecture, intercellular communication, and surrounding environment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review outlines current challenges and future priorities for preclinical studies in cardiac regenerative medicine, emphasizing the need to restore complex tissue architecture rather than just cardiomyocytes.
The myocardium consists of numerous cell types embedded in organized layers of ECM (extracellular matrix) and requires an intricate network of blood and lymphatic vessels and nerves to provide nutrients and electrical coupling to the cells. Although much of the focus has been on cardiomyocytes, these cells make up <40% of cells within a healthy adult heart. Therefore, repairing or regenerating cardiac tissue by merely reconstituting cardiomyocytes is a simplistic and ineffective approach. In fact, when an injury occurs, cardiac tissue organization is disrupted at the level of the cells, the tissue architecture, and the coordinated interaction among the cells. Thus, reconstitution of a functional tissue must reestablish electrical and mechanical communication between cardiomyocytes and restore their surrounding environment. It is also essential to restore distinctive myocardial features, such as vascular patency and pump function. In this article, we review the current status, challenges, and future priorities in cardiac regenerative or reparative medicine. In the first part, we provide an overview of our current understanding of heart repair and comment on the main contributors and mechanisms involved in innate regeneration. A brief section is dedicated to the novel concept of rejuvenation or regeneration, which we think may impact future development in the field. The last section describes regenerative therapies, where the most advanced and disruptive strategies used for myocardial repair are discussed. Our recommendations for priority areas in studies of cardiac regeneration or repair are summarized in Tables 1 and 2 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shamagian et al. (2019) conducted a review in Cardiac regeneration and repair. Cardiac regenerative therapies was evaluated. This review outlines the current status, challenges, and future priorities in cardiac regenerative medicine, emphasizing the need to restore both cellular and environmental tissue architecture.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: