Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (AiTBS) has attracted much attention in the past few years as a new form of brain stimulation paradigm. However, it is unclear the relative efficacy of AiTBS on cortical excitability compared to conventional high-frequency rTMS. Using concurrent TMS and electroencephalogram (TMS-EEG), this study systematically compared the efficacy on cortical excitability and a typical clinical application (i.e. pain), between AiTBS with different intersession interval (ISIs) and 10-Hz rTMS. Participants received 10-Hz rTMS, AiTBS-15 (3 iTBS sessions with a 15-min ISI), AiTBS-50 (3 iTBS sessions with a 50-min ISI), or Sham stimulation over the primary motor cortex on four separate days. All four protocols included a total of 1800 pulses but with different session durations (10-Hz rTMS = 18, AiTBS-15 = 40, and AiTBS-50 = 110 min). AiTBS-50 and 10-Hz rTMS were more effective in pain reduction compared to AiTBS-15. Using single-pulse TMS-induced oscillation, our data revealed low gamma oscillation as a shared cortical excitability change across all three active rTMS protocols but demonstrated completely opposite directions. Changes in low gamma oscillation were further associated with changes in pain perception across the three active conditions. In contrast, a distinct pattern of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) was revealed, with 10-Hz rTMS decreasing inhibitory N100 amplitude and AiTBS-15 reducing excitatory P60 amplitude. These changes in TEPs were also covarying with low gamma power changes. Sham stimulation indicated no significant effect on either cortical excitability or pain perception. These results are relevant only for provoked experimental pain, without being predictive for chronic pain, and revealed a change in low gamma oscillation, particularly around the very particular frequency of 40 Hz, shared between AiTBS and high-frequency rTMS. Conversely, cortical excitability (balance between excitation and inhibition) assessed by TEP recording was modulated differently by AiTBS and high-frequency rTMS paradigms.
Tan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.