Key result
Enoxaparin resulted in significantly higher ACLM levels than unfractionated heparin, indicating much higher bioavailability despite smaller injected amounts.
Why the study?
Does enoxaparin have different pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics compared to unfractionated heparin in human volunteers?
Does enoxaparin have different pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics compared to unfractionated heparin in human volunteers?
Enoxaparin has significantly higher bioavailability than unfractionated heparin, which is the primary functional difference between the two.
LMWH's higher bioavailability may favor its use over UFH in volunteers; leaves open outcome validation in patients.
We determined, in volunteers, the plasma levels of heparin above and below the critical chainlength necessary for thrombin inhibition (ACLM and BCLM), from 1 to 24 h after subcutaneous injection of 5000 IU unfractionated heparin (UFH), 40 mg enoxaparin and 1 mg/kg body weight of enoxaparin (LMWH) (n = 12 for each dose). The levels were calculated from the antithrombin- and anti-Xa activities using the specific activities of the materials injected. We also determined the course of thrombin- and of factor Xa generation after triggering the extrinsic system in the same samples. From the thrombin generation curves, we calculated the course of prothrombinase activity. When the ACLM and BCLM plasma-levels are plotted against the inhibition of thrombin- and factor Xa generation, it appears that: a) There is a unique dose response relationship between ACLM level and the inhibition of thrombin generation, independent of whether the ACLM is derived from UFH or LMWH. This relationship is not significantly altered by the BCLM appearing after LMWH injection. b) There is a similar unique relationship between ACLM level and the inhibition of factor Xa generation, again independent of BCLM. c) Inhibition of prothrombin activation hardly contributes to the overall effect on thrombin formation and is again independent of the source of ACLM. d) ACLM levels were significantly higher after injection of LMWH than after UFH injection, even though the amounts of ACLM injected with the highest dose of LMWH were smaller than those administered in the UFH injection. We conclude that the only functional difference between LMWH and UFH is the much higher bioavailability of the former.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bendetowicz et al. (1994) studied Healthy volunteers (n=12). Enoxaparin (LMWH) vs. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) 5000 IU was evaluated on Plasma levels of heparin (ACLM and BCLM) and inhibition of thrombin and factor Xa generation. Enoxaparin resulted in significantly higher ACLM levels than unfractionated heparin, indicating much higher bioavailability despite smaller injected amounts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: