A hostplant-habitat model is described which explains fundamental differences in mate-locating behaviour between butterfly species, based on a sequence of spatially distinctive activities (habitual patrolling, localized perching, territoriality, lek assembly). It gives equal weight to phylogeny and ecology and is consistent with models for the evolution of territoriality and population structure. Perching repeatedly at characteristic sites, territoriality and lek assembly evolve when resources become associated with distinctive hostplant-habitat structures in which topographic features provide predictable vantage points for acquiring mates. Habitual patrolling is an ancestral behaviour which is suited to widespread and unpredictable resource distributions and to species whose individual apparency detracts from the use of topographic vantage points. Hostplants (emergence sites), nectar and thermoregulation sites typically provide resources and act as precursors to localized perching, territoriality and lek assemblages. But these behaviours fail to evolve in species whose habitats do not include obvious topographic landmarks which provide clear vantage points for males awaiting females and focal points for females searching for males. Where these landmarks occur they result in an increase in receptive female density at those locations compared to the remainder of the habitat.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dennis et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: