Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of a head-to-head comparison between the performance of biparametric MRI (bpMRI; only T2-weighted imaging and DWI) and that of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI; T2-weighted imaging, DWI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI) for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to November 11, 2017. The search included diagnostic test accuracy studies that compared bpMRI and mpMRI for prostate cancer diagnosis with histopathologic findings from biopsy or radical prostatectomy as the reference standard. Methodologic quality was evaluated with the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled by means of bivariate and hierarchic summary ROC (HSROC) modeling and graphically presented with HSROC plots. Meta-regression analysis and multiple subgroup analyses were used to compare the diagnostic performances of bpMRI and mpMRI. RESULTS: Twenty studies (2142 patients) were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.66-0.81) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86-0.93) for bpMRI and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.69-0.82) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93) for mpMRI. MRI protocol (bpMRI vs mpMRI) was not a significant factor in heterogeneity (p = 0.83). In 26 subgroups evaluated on the basis of stratification to clinicopathologic, study, and MRI characteristics, MRI protocol (bpMRI vs mpMRI) was not a significant factor in heterogeneity in any subgroup (p = 0.25-0.97). CONCLUSION: A head-to-head comparison showed that the performance of bpMRI was similar to that of mpMRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Consistent results were found in multiple subgroup analyses.
Woo et al. (Fri,) studied this question.