Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study evaluates lung function and outcomes in children with congenital emphysema, suggesting positive results.
To evaluate clinical outcome and respiratory function in patients with congenital lobar/segmental emphysema (CLE/CSE) treated conservatively. In this single-centre retrospective study we included patients ≥5-year-old with a diagnosis of CLE/CSE, treated conservatively (diagnosis from 1990). We assessed demographic/anthropometric data, clinical outcome, pulmonary function tests (PFT) analyzed according to Global Lung Initiative. GraphPadPrism® (California, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Sixteen patients were enrolled (median age 9.3y; range 5-17): 13 had a prenatal diagnosis, 3 showed symptoms at birth. On chest computed tomography (CT), performed in the first 6 months of life, 9 children had lobar emphysema and 7 segmental emphysema. All patients showed a good growth, 14 were asymptomatic, 1 had recurrent respiratory infections and wheezing, 1 had allergic asthma. In 14 patients we performed PFT (median value): FVC 93.87%pred (IQR: 85.24; 107.69), Z-Score -0.52 (IQR: -1.39; 0.77); FEV1 93%pred (IQR: 78.75; 102.23), Z-Score -0.58 (IQR: -1.92; 0.34); RV 112.48%pred (IQR: 102.26; 137.70), Z-Score 0.25 (IQR: 0.05; 0.79); FRC 106.55%pred (IQR: 94.20; 111.04), Z-Score 0.31 (IQR: -0.29; 0.67); TLC 101.44%pred (IQR: 86.98; 113.25), Z-Score 0.11 (IQR: -0.96; 0.97), RV/TLC 122.94%pred (IQR: 113.52; 144.16), Z-Score 0.54 (IQR: 0.34; 1.01). Our data show that patients with CLE/CSE treated conservatively have a good clinical and functional outcome. Nonetheless, due to the short follow-up, further larger studies are needed to evaluate outcome into adulthood.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ganarin et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: