Key result
Fractionated ultrasound myocardial cavitation-enabled treatment reduced tissue strain by 35% in the target area relative to sham (p < 0.001), although it did not reduce wall thickness.
Why the study?
Does fractionated ultrasound myocardial cavitation enabled treatment (MCET) achieve similar myocardial reduction efficacy as a single prolonged treatment in a rat model?
Does fractionated ultrasound myocardial cavitation enabled treatment (MCET) achieve similar myocardial reduction efficacy as a single prolonged treatment in a rat model?
p-value: p=<0.001
Fractionated ultrasound myocardial cavitation enabled treatment achieves comparable tissue reduction effects to a single prolonged treatment, offering a potential non-invasive alternative to surgical myectomy or alcohol ablation.
Ultrasound myocardial cavitation enabled treatment (MCET) is an image-guided method for tissue reduction. In this study, a strategy of fractionated (multiple) treatments was tested for efficacy. Dahl SS rats were anesthetized and prepared for treatment with a focused ultrasound transducer in a warm water bath. Aiming at the anterior left ventricular wall was facilitated by imaging with a 10 MHz phased array (10S, GE Vivid 7, GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway). MCET was accomplished at 1.5 MHz by pulse bursts of 4 MPa peak rarefactional pressure amplitude, which were intermittently triggered 1:8 from the ECG during infusion of a microbubble suspension for cavitation nucleation. Test groups were sham, a 200 s treatment, three 200 s treatments a week apart, and a 600 s treatment. Treatment outcome was observed by plasma troponin after 4 h, echocardiographic monitoring and histology at 6 wk. The impacts of the fractionated treatments summed to approximately the same as the long treatment; e. g. the troponin result was 10.5 ± 3.2 for 200 s, 22.7 ± 5.4 (p < 0.001) for the summed fractionated treatments and 29.9 ± 6.4 for 600 s (p = 0.06 relative to the summed fractionated). While wall thickness was not reduced for the fractionated treatment, tissue strain was reduced by 35% in the target area relative sham (p < 0.001). The ability to fractionate treatment may be advantageous for optimizing patient outcome relative to all-or nothing therapy by surgical myectomy or alcohol ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (2017) studied Myocardial reduction (Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy model) (n=23). Fractionated ultrasound myocardial cavitation-enabled treatment (MCET) vs. Sham treatment was evaluated on Tissue strain reduction (p=<0.001). Fractionated ultrasound myocardial cavitation-enabled treatment reduced tissue strain by 35% in the target area relative to sham (p < 0.001), although it did not reduce wall thickness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: