Key result
Comorbid arthritis is linked to ~60% higher prevalence of activity limitations in cardiovascular disease.
Cross-Sectional (n=115,915)
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to quantify the contribution of comorbidity to activity limitations in populations with chronic cardiovascular disease, diabetes or respiratory disease (index conditions), with emphasis on musculoskeletal comorbidity (arthritis or back problems). METHODS: Analysis of the 2005 Canadian Community Health Survey 3.1 (age 20+ years, n = 115,915). Prevalence ratios for activity limitations in people with the index conditions and co-occurring musculoskeletal disease, adjusted for age, gender, and socioeconomic factors, were used to estimate population associated fractions (PAF). RESULTS: Comorbid arthritis and back problems significantly increased the risk of activity limitations across all index conditions with prevalence ratios of 1.60 and 1.46 for cardiovascular disease, 1.51 and 1.36 for diabetes, and 1.38 and 1.44 for respiratory disease for arthritis and back problems respectively. Arthritis and back problems accounted for at least 13% and 9% of activity limitations in the index populations. CONCLUSIONS: While chronic musculoskeletal conditions are not always considered priorities in chronic disease prevention, they account for a substantial proportion of activity restrictions seen in people with cardiovascular disease, diabetes and respiratory disease, with implications for prevention and control strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slater et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in cardiovascular disease, diabetes or respiratory disease (n=115,915). Musculoskeletal comorbidity (arthritis or back problems) vs. Absence of musculoskeletal comorbidity was evaluated on activity limitations (PR 1.60). Comorbid arthritis and back problems significantly increased activity limitations in patients with cardiovascular disease (PR 1.60 and 1.46), diabetes, and respiratory disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: