Key result
High pain resilience was characterized by significantly lower skin conductance levels during the anticipation, experiencing, and recovery from painful shock compared to lower resilience groups.
Why the study?
Although behavioral and brain structure correlates of pain resilience have been documented, associated physiological responses have received little consideration.
Observational (n=111)
Higher pain resilience is characterized by reduced skin conductance levels during the anticipation, experience, and recovery from painful stimuli.
Psychophysiological differences by pain resilience level seen in lab tasks; leaves open whether markers predict real-world outcomes or inform interventions.
Although researchers have documented behavioral and brain structure correlates of pain resilience, associated physiological responses have received little consideration. In this study, we assessed psychophysiological differences between high (HPR), moderate (MPR), and low (LPR) pain resilience subgroups during anticipation, experiencing, and recovery from laboratory pain. In an initial pain anticipation task, participants (79 women, 32 man) viewed visual cues to signal possible mild or intense shocks prior to receiving these shocks. Subsequently, in a pain recovery task, participants received uncued mild and intense shocks. Subjective appraisals were assessed during each task in tandem with continuous recording of skin conductance level (SCL), heart rate variability (HRV), and corrugator electromyography (cEMG). On physiological indexes, HPR subgroup members displayed significantly lower SCL than MPR and LPR subgroups did during anticipation and experiencing of pain while no resilience group effects were found for HRV or cEMG. During pain recovery, HPR and LPR subgroups displayed weaker SCL than the MPR subgroup did in the immediate aftermath of shock. However, HPR members continued to display lower SCL than other groups did over an extended recovery period. On self-report measures, the LPR subgroup reported higher levels of anticipatory anxiety and expected pain than HPR and MPR subgroups did during the pain anticipation task. Together, results suggested higher pain resilience is characterized, in part, by comparatively reduced SCL during the course of anticipating, experiencing and recovering from painful shock.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Pain resilience (n=111). High pain resilience vs. Moderate and low pain resilience was evaluated on Skin conductance level (SCL), heart rate variability (HRV), and corrugator electromyography (cEMG). High pain resilience was characterized by significantly lower skin conductance levels during the anticipation, experiencing, and recovery from painful shock compared to lower resilience groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: