Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Social and behavioral research often needs to examine policy shocks, information interventions, platform-mediated attention, and governance feedback, but direct experiments on real populations are constrained by ethical risks, intervention costs, and limited repeatability. This study proposes Multi-Agent Social Simulation (MASS), a protocolized form of large language model-driven agent-based modeling (LLM-driven ABM) designed as a low-risk, repeatable, and auditable pre-experimental simulation method for quantitative research. MASS embeds LLMs in an agent-based modeling (ABM) framework and uses role settings, round-based scheduling, information control, background-rule control, structured outputs, harness checks, reason-action logs, and replication manifests to transform open-ended language generation into recordable, checkable, and statistically analyzable agent-round observations. The method is evaluated through the New Jersey–Pennsylvania minimum wage natural experiment, the 2016 UK Brexit digital campaigning context, and the 2023 Zibo barbecue tourism public-opinion event. Results show that protocolized LLM-driven ABM can generate analyzable and empirically assessable outputs across policy-shock, information-intervention, and governance-feedback scenarios. The strongest evidence concerns rule-shock identification, declining undecided share under targeting, and mechanism-chain consistency among governance response, public sentiment, and behavioral intention. MASS is not a substitute for real-world experiments or causal inference; it is a pre-experimental simulation method for mechanism rehearsal, risk identification, counterfactual comparison, and research design preparation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: