Key result
High-risk drinking, identified in 27.2% of depressed patients, was associated with significantly higher GT, CDT, and IL-6 than abstainers, with GT-CDT providing the highest diagnostic accuracy.
Why the study?
Alcohol consumption plays a major role in depression pathogenesis and prognosis, but reliably identifying hazardous drinking remains problematic.
What is the accuracy of different biomarkers and self-reports in identifying hazardous drinking in patients with major depressive disorder?
Cohort (n=202)
What is the accuracy of different biomarkers and self-reports in identifying hazardous drinking in patients with major depressive disorder?
The combined use of GT-CDT and AUDIT questionnaires improves the identification of hazardous drinking in patients with depression.
Supports GT-CDT screening for hidden drinking in depression; leaves open prospective validation and outcome impact.
AIMS: Alcohol consumption has been suggested a major role in the pathogenesis and prognosis of depression. However, reliable identification of hazardous drinking continues to be problematic. We compared the accuracy of different biomarkers and self-reports of alcohol consumption in the follow-up study of depression. METHODS: Data from 202 patients with major depressive disorder were obtained through self-reports, AUDIT and AUDIT-C questionnaires and biomarker analyses. The clinical assessments and measurements of biomarkers (GT, CDT, GT-CDT-combination, MCV, ALT, AST, hs-CRP, IL-6) were performed at baseline and after six months of treatment. Based on self-reported alcohol intake at baseline the patients were classified to three subgroups. RESULTS: About 27.2% of patients were categorized to high-risk drinkers, 26.3% low-risk drinkers and 46.5% abstainers. High-risk drinkers showed significantly higher mean values of GT, CDT, GT-CDT-combination and IL-6 than abstainers, diagnostic accuracy being highest with the combined marker of GT-CDT. The accuracy of AUDIT and AUDIT-C to detect high-risk drinking was also significant. During follow-up, the differences observed in the biomarkers at baseline disappeared together with recovery from depression. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest the combined use of GT-CDT and AUDIT questionnaires to improve the identification of drinking of patients with depression. This approach could be useful for improving treatment adherence and outcome in depressed patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Archer et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in major depressive disorder (n=202). High-risk alcohol consumption vs. Abstainers and low-risk drinkers was evaluated on Accuracy of different biomarkers and self-reports to detect high-risk drinking. High-risk drinking, identified in 27.2% of depressed patients, was associated with significantly higher GT, CDT, and IL-6 than abstainers, with GT-CDT providing the highest diagnostic accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: