The method presented allows the determination of the optimal and n-1 secure power system state by switching operations. A linear switching model is applied in an active way to model the control actions and in a more passive way to set up contingency constraints. Using the switching model in a dual role permits the integration of contingencies and control actions into one optimization algorithm. Thus, with exactly one optimization step the power system can be improved considering various security levels. A comparison is made between preventive conservative and postcontingency rescheduling. The main difference lies in the time-dependent performance of the topology changes in establishing a normal undisturbed system state if any contingency occurs. The preventive way of rescheduling has the advantage that there are no limit violations produced by a contingency. In postcontingency rescheduling short-term overloads are tolerated. This system state has the advantage of lower production costs. The performance of the algorithm is shown in a test case.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schnyder et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: