Key result
Adding terminal rating of perceived exertion to 6-minute walk test distance improved the prediction of peak oxygen uptake (R2 = 0.71) and ventilatory threshold (R2 = 0.69).
Why the study?
The 6MWT distance has an imperfect relationship with VO2peak and lacks equations to estimate ventilatory threshold, which is crucial for exercise prescription and prognosis.
Does adding terminal rating of perceived exertion (RPE) to 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance improve the prediction of VO2peak and ventilatory threshold in cardiac rehabilitation patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=63)
Does adding terminal rating of perceived exertion (RPE) to 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance improve the prediction of VO2peak and ventilatory threshold in cardiac rehabilitation patients?
Adding terminal rating of perceived exertion to the 6-minute walk test distance improves the estimation of exercise capacity and ventilatory threshold, aiding in exercise prescription for cardiac rehabilitation patients.
Walking tests, such as the 6-min walk test (6MWT), are popular methods of estimating peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) in clinical populations. However, the strength of the distance vs. VO2peak relationship is not strong, and there are no equations for estimating ventilatory threshold (VT), which is important for training prescription and prognosis. Since the 6MWT is often limited by walking mechanics, prediction equations that include simple additional predictors, such as the terminal rating of perceived exertion (RPE), hold the potential for improving the prediction of VO2max and VT. Therefore, this study was designed to develop equations for predicting VO2peak and VT from performance during the 6MWT, on the basis of walking performance and terminal RPE. Clinically stable patients in a cardiac rehabilitation program (N = 63) performed the 6MWT according to the American Thoracic Society guidelines. At the end of each walk, the subject provided their terminal RPE on a 6–20 Borg scale. Each patient also performed a maximal incremental treadmill test with respiratory gas exchange to measure VO2peak and VT. There was a good correlation between VO2peak and 6MWT distance (r = 0.80) which was improved by adding the terminal RPE in a multiple regression formula (6MWT + RPE, R2 = 0.71, standard error of estimate, SEE = 1.3 Metabolic Equivalents (METs). The VT was also well correlated with walking performance, 6MWT distance (r = 0.80), and was improved by the addition of terminal RPE (6MWT + RPE, R2 = 0.69, SEE = 0.95 METs). The addition of terminal RPE to 6MWT distance improved the prediction of maximal METs and METs at VT, which may have practical applications for exercise prescription.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Porcari et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiac rehabilitation (n=63). 6-minute walk test (6MWT) plus terminal rating of perceived exertion (RPE) vs. 6MWT alone was evaluated on Prediction of peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) (R2 = 0.71). Adding terminal rating of perceived exertion to 6-minute walk test distance improved the prediction of peak oxygen uptake (R2 = 0.71) and ventilatory threshold (R2 = 0.69).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: